This webinar is hosted by the Battered Women's Justice Project and is open to the public. 


In this webinar, we explore the question of whether Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) risk assessments (RAs) are racially biased. We situate IPV RAs within the broader movement to assess risk, links to bail reform and changes in pretrial detention, and research examining claims of racial bias in RAs. We then review some of the case law regarding acceptable use of RAs at various points in the legal process. We next turn to the development of IPV RAs in the field of violence against women. We discuss how these tools work and some of the pros and cons of using them. Our discussion leads us to ask whether IPV RAs might be racially biased against the accused, the alleged victim, or both parties. Importantly, the extant research does not answer the extraordinarily complex question of whether IPV RAs are racially biased. We therefore stress the need to consider the implications of using IPV RAs in the broader movement to confront IPV, particularly noting their limitations and tendency to mask bigger questions.  


Dr. Kathleen J. Ferraro, Director of Training & Curriculum, Family Violence Institute, Northern Arizona University and Dr. Neil Websdale, Director, Family Violence Institute, Northern Arizona University

Logistical Information

  • A webinar is on online seminar and requires internet access to connect.
  • You will receive a confirmation email from immediately after registering. If you don't see it in your inbox, please check your spam or junk mail. Please keep this email as it contains the webinar and audio information needed to join the webinar. You will receive a reminder email the day before the webinar as well.
  • Audio options include: VoIP (free audio through the internet, speakers are required, a headset is recommended) or dialing into a teleconference line (your standard long distance charges will apply).
  • Closed Captioning will be provided.
  • We do not provide CEUs
  • Questions? Contact Kari Sonmore at